Quick Quote
Speak to a Play Specialist
The Science of Play
Most organisational interventions try to improve performance by teaching behaviours on top of the current operating environment. But when teams are under constant load, the problem is rarely knowledge. It is the state people are operating from. That is why well-intended initiatives struggle to stick.
Science of Play: Unlocking Human Potential is a science-backed session delivered through Corporate Challenge Events’ exclusive Australasian partnership with the National Institute for Play (NIFPlay). It reframes play as a biological and public health necessity, and the missing performance infrastructure modern workplaces keep designing out.
This session focuses on the conditions that performance runs on. It shows leaders what degrades when play drops out and why culture becomes fragile under pressure. The result is a clear, evidence-led way to restore the operating conditions that allow people to think well, work well together, and sustain high performance without relying on motivation alone.
It ends with practical tools, shared language for buy-in, and a clear pathway forward, supported by optional resources to help the shift carry beyond the event.
Play as Performance Infrastructure
Play is a public health necessity
The National Institute for Play positions play as essential across the lifespan and a public health necessity for wellbeing. The science makes one thing clear: biology sets the limits of performance in modern work.
The creation of something new is not accomplished by the intellect but by the play instinct acting from inner necessity. The creative mind plays with the objects it loves.
What play restores at work
In workplaces, play supports the operating conditions high performance depends on: regulation under load, learning readiness, and the ability to work well with other people when pressure is constant. When those conditions degrade, culture becomes brittle and performance becomes harder to sustain. This matters right now. In 2024, global engagement dropped, manager engagement fell to 27%, and the productivity cost was estimated at US$438B.